Archive for February, 2010

Recommended considerations for selecting an Alternate Recovery Site

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Do you need to select an alternate recovery site for your business continuity or IT disaster recovery?

In the event of a disaster, it is crucial that your organisation can transition as smoothly as possible into a recovery site and commence working on critical business processes as quickly as possible.  Ensuring that an appropriate alternate recovery site has been selected is key to this smooth transition.

OpsCentre has released a succinct 2 page guide to considerations for selecting the right recovery site.

The report covers aspect such as:

  1. Location of the recovery site
  2. A list of must-have pre-requisites that every recovery site should have
  3. Site Security
  4. Technical Infrastructure considerations
  5. Other site characteristics to be considered

Go HERE to request your copy of the COMPLIMENTARY, OBLIGATION-FREE Alternate Site Selection Report.

Have you outgrown your paper-based business continuity and disaster recovery plans?

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

Your organisation has changed and you are finding that the current “paper-based” planning methodology no longer is fit for purpose. 

If you recognise any of the following items familiar, it may be time to invest in a business continuity software planning solution:

 1.       Are your plans hard to maintain and have numerous areas for updates?

2.       Would the volume of updates and changes be better suited to the functionality of a relational database?

3.       Does your organisation have numerous Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery stakeholders that are required to provide input and updates to the plans?

4.       Is the import of your Business Impact Analysis (BIA) information a manual process taking significant time and effort to complete?

5.       Is it difficult to provide granular reporting to Senior Management and auditors?

6.       Is additional plan security required?

7.       Are some sections of the plans “off limits” to certain groups or business units?

8.       Is Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery exercising and training difficult to organise and complete?

9.       Does your current plan require greater geographical coverage for your branch offices?

10.   Are updates completed in a scheduled manner (or 1 week prior to an audit or test)?

If you answered “Yes” to any of these questions, odds are that a more sophisticated Business Continuity/Disaster Recovery planning tool may be of use to the maintenance and health of your management program.

The best part is that this is not a “throw the baby out with the bathwater” scenario.  Some of the better planning tools allow for the import of completed planning data directly into the software tool, retaining all of your previously completed hard work .

Time spent evaluating a Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery software planning tool may benefit your constantly changing and evolving plans and be of great value to your organisation.

Business Resilience and Agility

Friday, February 19th, 2010

We are increasingly hearing about the word resilience. When speaking scientifically it refers the physical property of a material to ‘bounce back’ to its original position after deformation that does not broaden elastic limitations.

Irregular change is nothing new to modern enterprises: witness the colossal changes in technology and economies as well as social and environmental developments. We are living in a world which is constantly evolving, changing and expanding. Enterprises need to respond by bolstering their suppleness and agility. We are constantly witnessing modification as these groups create ‘virtual enterprises’ in which they share key process with other businesses, they construct   infrastructures which support expansion, and create environments that sustain varied lifestyles.

Agility is becoming increasingly important as is resilience. We witnessed large spread change on September the 11th as the world was catapulted into a ‘new normal’, one of indecision and unrest.  Resilient organizations bounced back within a short period whilst non- resilient struggled to re-establish, and rebuild.

Agility is an offensive strategy while resilience is defensive and refers to a means of recovery from unanticipated events.  Working in a variety of different industries I believe that resilient organizations are ones which have adopted it as an attitude. It is part of their corporate culture and the product of the persona of individuals in an organization. One cannot build a durable organization on the shoulders of those who don’t embrace it. If a leader has it as a character trait then followers will more than likely follow suit as they tend to adopt similar characteristics.

Resilience begins at home and has to be sustained over time. 

Have you though about the vulnerabilities and areas of weakness in your own business and how to improve your level of operational resilience to address them?